Commentary for Bava Kamma 28:16

בפני בית דין:

Rab Judah b. Hinena pointed out the following contradiction to R. Huna the son of R. Joshua: It has been taught: 'MONEY'S FORTH implies that the Court will not have recourse for distraint save to immovable property; behold, was it not taught: He shall return<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ex. XXI, 34. ');">¹⁰</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 28:16. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.